City Sports Report

Daily Debate: Randy Moss or Terrell Owens, Who Would You Take?

With Randy Moss announcing his retirement yesterday after 13 years in the National Football League playing with the Minnesota Vikings, Oakland Raiders, New England Patriots, and Tennessee Titans.  Terrell Owens is another talented wide receiver who has played 15 years in the NFL with the San Francisco 49ers, Philadelphia Eagles, Dallas Cowboys, Buffalo Bills, and Cincinnati Bengals.  Looking back on their careers, if you had to chose one, taking the good with the bad, which future Hall of Fame wide receiver would you take, Randy Moss or Terrell Owens?  Voice your opinion on the Razz and Jazz Sports Blog Daily Debate.


  1. Bobby Charts

    August 2, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    Niether! lol do I Have to pick one? If I had to take one it would be T.O., man that hurts to say that.

    • Derrel "Jazz" Johnson

      August 2, 2011 at 4:40 pm

      Interesting that you would take TO Bobby, I’d take Moss, but I’d hate it when he quits too

  2. Raquel

    August 2, 2011 at 4:10 pm

    I would have to say Randy Moss. As a whole, he exhibited a higher level of professionalism.

    • Derrel "Jazz" Johnson

      August 2, 2011 at 4:41 pm

      Raquel, professionalism and these two don’t go together. Owens is definitely more of a Drama King, but Moss just straight-up quit on his teams. Heck, even now he was offered a one-year deal from the New England Patriots , and decided to retire instead.

      • Raquel

        August 5, 2011 at 3:47 pm

        At least when Moss decides to do the job, she shuts up and does the damn job.

  3. Matt

    August 2, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    Moss i guess if i had to choose. Better in the locker room and no outside issues.

    • Derrel "Jazz" Johnson

      August 2, 2011 at 4:42 pm

      Moss had his outside issues too, he tried to from over a female officer lol

  4. Al

    August 2, 2011 at 4:50 pm

    Let me say this! Many of you may ridcule both subjects. But I would take both guys . Their desire to play and win is unmatched. Yes, you will get a lot of B.S. that comes with them. They are personalities. Just like Rodman, Iverson and a few others. But these characters can play! It’s good to have a Phil Jackson type of coach for them. And for all of the people who ridicule them and call them names. Just remember the billionaire owners enjoy the profits and the value added to their stock because of these “Problems”. They all played into their 30’s and more than 10 years into the game. They sold a lot of Jerseys that go into the league and owners pocket$. And when they “act up” Pay hefty fines to the League and owners. Bottom line. The above are all great players. I’ll have them on my team.

  5. Tim everson

    August 2, 2011 at 5:26 pm

    T.o hands down the better of the two! And even with a poor QB and team last season T.O put up almost 1000 yards. This guy is still a baller.

  6. thenewsofsports

    August 2, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    Either one. T.O. had a great season for his age last year and Randy Moss still has something in the tank I think.

    • Derrel "Jazz" Johnson

      August 2, 2011 at 6:55 pm

      I agree, Moss definitely has something left in the tank. I think Owens will return too.

  7. Al

    August 3, 2011 at 8:52 pm

    Moss. He could still command double coverage. And this opens up my other receivers.

  8. kingsly

    August 4, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    randy moss he’s still one of the best jus ask darrelle revis the best cornerback in the game. Moss put him out for a couple of games last season n ask tom brady bout tha 2007 season bill brought in moss to get his QB back to a high level n randy made him into a record breaking QB for tha year. The second year bill anit use him cause ever team double n triple him on ever play n bill did’nt want his QB throwing interceptions tha’s wat randy does, go n get tha ball with two n three people on him n comes down with tha ball. Wud luv for him to help mark take down take record he gave to tom in 07…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>